Call Us - We're Easy to Talk To (214) 999-9999

The Shocking Truth About Medication Errors

Our law firm has seen a lot of situations in which consumers suffered damages, from minor to life-threatening, from improperly dispensed prescription medication. Some of the details of this problem were discussed in a recent article in Forbes. Here are excerpts:

Let’s say a physician writes a prescription for Colchicine and accidentally orders “10.0 mg,” when he should have ordered “1.0 mg.” That’s a tiny decimal error, a mistake even the best doctor could make. But it can be catastrophic for the patient. The higher dose could cause Colchicine poisoning, similar to arsenic poisoning: burning in the mouth and throat, excruciating abdominal pain. Internal organs would melt away and death would likely occur within 24 to 72 hours.

The ease with which even the best doctors can make gruesome errors is why hospitals set up elaborate systems to check and double check orders before drugs are given to patients. Some hospitals are better at this checking than others. Medication errors happen all the time, an estimated one million each year, contributing to 7,000 deaths. On average there is one medication error every day for every inpatient. Let’s take a closer look at what’s contributing to these preventable errors.

Hospitals Are In The Technological Dark Ages

According to recent research, the best known way for hospitals to protect patients from errors is by adopting technology called computerized physician order entry (CPOE). The physician (or other authorized prescriber) enters orders for a patient on a computer that contains patient information such as key lab values, clinical condition, allergies, etc. The computer checks the safety and appropriateness of the order and sends it electronically to the pharmacy. In the Colchicine example, a good CPOE system would alert the physician to the misplaced decimal in the order, and the best systems would prevent the order from being written in the first place. In my mind, one of the greatest advances of CPOE is that it eliminates the need for pharmacists to decipher physician handwriting. I’ve often wondered how they do that.

The research suggests errors decline by as much as 85 percent when hospitals implement CPOE, yet the pace of adoption in the hospital industry is agonizingly slow. To jump start progress, the federal government used economic stimulus funds starting back in 2009 to incentivize hospital investment in CPOE and electronic medical records (EMRs). That improved the pace of change, but still, most hospitals are in the Dark Ages when compared to other industries like airlines or retail.

Three Ways To Fix The Problem

It is imperative that several things happen to protect consumers from medication errors. First, stakeholders must come together, lay out the best practices for implementing CPOE and make it available to all of the nation’s hospitals immediately. Today, many hospitals rely on their vendors for instruction and full implementation. But vendors’ interests do not always make patient safety a top priority — that’s the job of the hospital. Hospitals need more tools and collaboration to successfully adopt this technology.

Second, taxpayer money invested in health care should hold hospitals accountable for preserving the safety of patients. This sounds so obvious it hardly needs to be stated, except, well, it needs to be stated – because it’s not the case today. Despite our repeated pleadings and those of our purchaser members, the administration’s current criteria for paying hospitals to install CPOE doesn’t require the hospitals to test and monitor the safety of their CPOE systems. This is a mind-boggling oversight, suggesting it is more important to your government that hospitals have whizz bang technology than prove the technology actually works for the patient.

The giant federal agency that funds Medicare, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), will tie some of its payments to hospitals to their safety record — which is a good thing, required by ObamaCare. But, as purchaser and consumer advocates complained in a letter to CMS, there is no plan to include medication errors in the criteria for determining how safe hospitals are. This makes little sense, since medication errors are far and away the most common errors hospitals make.

Finally, employers and other purchasers should favor hospitals that have a monitored CPOE system. That means they should tilt toward these hospitals in benefits design and contracting. In addition to the harm done to your employees when CPOE systems are not in place or are deployed badly, errors are also costly to purchasers. And it’s purchasers — not hospitals — that pay most of the price tag for those errors. Purchasers can actually estimate how much they are paying for the privilege of harming employees using the free tool available here.

The Real Reason Hospitals Don’t Invest In The Right Technology

The fact that hospitals can usually pass the cost of errors to purchasers is precisely the reason adoption of CPOE stalls. Hospitals are much speedier and technologically savvy when their profits are threatened.

In fairness, hospitals respond to health care financing incentives from the government, as well as the private sector, and those incentives rarely reward hospitals for doing the right thing. To their immense credit, many hospitals competently deploy CPOE and electronic health records (EHRs) whatever the financial benefit. Next it is up to us — as citizens, patients and payers — to focus our attention and our market power on those hospitals, the ones that put their patients’ health and well-being first.

Bob Kraft

I am a Dallas, Texas lawyer who has had the privilege of helping thousands of clients since 1971 in the areas of Personal Injury law and Social Security Disability.

About This Blog

The title of this blog reflects my attitude toward those government agencies and insurance companies that routinely mistreat injured or disabled people. As a Dallas, Texas lawyer, I've spent more than 45 years trying to help those poor folk, and I have been frustrated daily by the actions of the people on the other side of their claims. (Sorry if I offended you...)

If you find this type of information interesting or helpful, please visit my law firm's main website at You will find many more articles and links. Thank you for your time.

Find us on your preferred network